The American Kafir

Obama’s History Concerning Israel

View this document on Scribd

1 Comment »

  1. 1
    THE LEGACY OF PRESIDENT OBAMA and FRANCE IN AFRICA
    By Joseph Haba, MAE/ADM
    PhD Candidate
    Author: EDUCATION, DEMOCRACY & LEADERHIP
    February 17, 2012
    Hundreds of million Africans, including me, had the impression that President Obama, whose father was born in Africa, was going to stand with Africa against the French neocolonialism in Africa until he was elected President of the United States. We thought that Obama was going to be a blessing for Africa‟s emancipation the same way Dr. Martin Luther King, whose legacy was the key that opened the door of the White House to President Obama, accepted the leadership of the Civil Right Movements. However, after listening President Obama when he said France was the United States greatest ally. Especially after seeing thousands of Christians, slaughtered and sometimes burned alive by Muslim rebels who were supported by France backed by President Obama. And the rebel leader, French puppet and enemy of emancipation in African was received by President Obama in the White House. (Watch the video by Senator Inhofe).
    Your perception of President Obama will forever change if you have the time to read this account. The French people have been very successful in twisting, deceiving, misleading, deforming and camouflaging the history of breeding AIDS victims, financing African civil wars, promoting drug smuggling, encouraging Muslim slave trade, and propagating anti-Americanism in Africa.
    2
    Over a period of three years, the French have used President Obama‟s influence in the world, as president of the most powerful nation on earth, to depose Christian patriots who were democratically elected president in Africa and replaced them by Muslim rebels because the rebels support French neocolonialism. The greatest tragedy about Obama backing French neocolonialism is that most Americans are unaware of the monetary benefit President Obama receive from France under covered. The tragedy is even worse when President Obama use African Americans, who are totally ignorant of historical facts about Africa, and renegade Africans, particularly the African Muslim community to commit the most hideous crimes the world has ever know: promoting slavery in Africa.
    Before giving specific details, I am going to make the following statement with its backing proofs. The worst and most anti-African and Anti-American is the diabolic institution of the French occult system: La Francafrique. This institution that the French used to inject anti-Africanism, slavery, and anti-Americanism is now promoted, refined and implemented by the French and its African surrogates. The African traitors are the illiterate black converts to Slam. The French two cultures of denying the facts about subjugating the African people and the concepts of French protectorate in the name of supporting democracy in Africa may attack us without disproving a single statement made here, or without disproving the conclusions that will be made here. For example, without getting help from loyalists from the United States government and African traitors, the French politicians are hated by Africans, but “Africans look to Washington for square deal” (Ralph Peters, 2007).
    In his book, Wars of Blood and Faith, Ralph Peters, a retired U.S. Army officer with experience in seventy countries, wrote, “I visited French-speaking West Africa. Wherever I went, two things remained consistent: The French government was hated, and Africans looked to Washington for a square deal. President Jacques Chirac and his racist minions know it, and they don‟t like it, and they‟re trying to do something about it: Sucker America into showing „solidarity with an ally in the War on Terror.‟ The French want our military and diplomatic cooperation – but not our economic presence, of course. Let me translate what the parasites of Paris really mean: „Support our brutality and exploitation of West Africa, stiff-arm tens of millions of Africans yearning to be free of French neo-imperialism – and just maybe we clever Frenchmen will toss you stupid Americans a little bone now and then.‟ And we‟re in danger of falling for it” (p. 316). This author continued, “the French government and French business interests have looted everything they possibly could. To Paris, African „independence‟ meant business as usual, except that Paris would no longer accept any responsibility for the welfare of the local population…. Guaranteed by a French military that had failed everywhere else but remained sufficiently competent to bully unarmed Africans…In West Africa, everyone has a friend or relative, or the friend of a relative, in one of New York‟s boroughs or in Chicago. They vision of America is of hardworking immigrants building prosperous lives impossible elsewhere. The American dream is alive and well – in Dakar or Abidjan [two cities in West Africa]” (p. 317).
    3
    In fact, the French are in trouble in Africa because we Africans who continue to be their neo-imperialistic victims are sick and tired of being treated as inferior races and of being robbed of our natural resources. The French know these realities, and they have used President Obama‟s administration to continue robbing Africa. Now why should ordinary Americans be concerned about an American president standing with the French as his/her greatest ally? As Peters said, the French offer cooperation with the United States which implies that “white powers should stick together, after all,” while the French benefit from this relationship, the United States only loses “prestige, influence, and goodwill by being associated with the French in West Africa… as fare as Paris is concerned: [France] wants to present a united Western front to Africans yearning for real freedom, to show them that Washington isn‟t an alternative because America‟s on France‟s side. This duplicity is especially dangerous, given that many French-speaking African countries have majority-Muslim populations – Muslims who are not anti-American.”
    However, the supports of some American politicians, who receive millions of dollars from the French as commissions, to support the French hegemony against American interest, are changing friends of the United States into enemies of the United States. What is even troubling is the enmity these politicians behaviors have created between Christians and Muslims.
    Around the world, more than a billion people love and embrace the Judio-Christian culture because of their faith and their salvation in Jesus Christ. People manifest their attachment to Israel in Churches, in Synagogues, in politics, in homes, and in education. But for many centuries the people of Israel have been persecuted, driven from their home, experienced one of the gruesome genocide in history, and some people want to wipe them on the world map. This means Israeli are not fit to live on this planet? Are the Arabs more worthy to live more than the Jews and vice versa? Are the French and President Obama more worthy to decide on behalf of the Israeli more than the people of Israel? Should the United States, friends of Israel and Israel be more concerned about the French and Iranian threats more than any terrorist organizations?
    The French government, embodied by its president, “Sarkozy reportedly gives Abbas „clear support‟ for creation of state” without Israel‟ consent (Krieger and Keinon, 2011). In addition, UNESCO, an international organization based in France, approved full membership for Palestine statehood without consent from the parties involved: Palestine and Israel. Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has predicted the failure of the Middle East talks and the removal of “the Zionist regime from the world scene”. In response the pro-government crowd chanted “Death to America. Death to Israel.”
    4
    “One of the strangest things is that France is not ready at all to define Hizbollah as a terrorist organization when it is one of the most dangerous around.” – Ariel Sharon, February 23, 2005”. “Is France an ally or an adversary of the United States?” – U.S. Vice President Richard Cheney “France is no longer an ally of the United States and the NATO alliance must develop a strategy to contain our erstwhile ally or we will not be talking about a NATO alliance” – Richard Pearl. “American power was considered (by France) to be more dangerous than Saddam Hussein, to put it bluntly,”, “This is something we simply do not understand.”, “could not understand why liberating Iraq could not be considered to be a just cause… The way this issue was presented (by Paris) caused lots of dismay.” – U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.
    If France is not an ally of the United States, it is Israel‟s greatest enemy just like Iran. Sarkozy told Obama, “Netanyahu, I can’t stand him. He’s a liar.” Was Obama influenced by French anti-Semitism when he said, “You are sick of him, but I have to work with him every day”, or did he approve Sarkozy‟s incendiary comment?
    If you ask me: those are unacceptable acts of war France and Iran have planned against the Unites States, Israel and countries with Judio-Christian traditions. And French and Iran must reap the consequences. Many people will debate with me, but let me make my points:
    France is a viper numb with cold and out of perceived friendship. France is placed in Israel America‟s bosom. However, sooner will France and Iran be capable of uniting the whole world against the United States and Israel, France and Iran will turn upon their benefactors and inflict fatal bites upon Americans and Israeli. The warning signs are there. First France has to stifle the United States and Israel by creating proxy conflicts the United States and Israel.
    According to Mosab Hassan Yousel, in his book: Son of Hamas, France is like a moderate Muslim, and Iran is a fundamentalist. “Traditional Muslims stand at the foot of the ladder, living in guilt for not really practicing Islam. At the top are the fundamentalists, the ones you see in the news killing women and children for the glory of the god of the Qur‟an…A moderate Muslim is actually more dangerous than a fundamentalist, however, because he appears to be harmless, and you can never tell when he has taken that next step toward the top. Most suicide bombers began as moderates,” (Yousel, page 12). How has France become a suicide bomber?
    “In the 1967 Six Day War, when Israel’s existence was threatened, France’s president Charles de Gaulle took a pro-Arab direction and instituted a weapons embargo
    5
    on the Middle East. In his press conference on November 27 of that year he included a much publicized anti-Semitic statement, calling the Jews „an elitist and domineering people.‟ This is often considered the beginning of post-Holocaust anti-Semitism in the democratic mainstream of Europe. During the 1978 Yom Kippur war, despite the embargo, France supplied Mirage planes Israel had already bought to Libya; they were afterwards transferred to Egypt.
    France has to prevent the United States and Israel from getting lucrative markets in Africa, and France will continue to do everything to immobilize the United States and Israeli economic powers. For example, “With the end of the Cold War the list of disagreements between the USA and France increased. France and the USA clashed about the liberalisation of cultural goods, knowing both that the spread of culture goes with that of values and economic powership. They clashed again about NATO‟s strategies and leadership, in 1996, and again for the appointment of the new UN Secretary-General, after B. Boutros-Ghali.”
    France has been dismembering American and Israeli businesses in Africa, and the French consider the duo United States-Israel as a threat to their national security. According to French officials, “US threat is a genuine concern for French authorities, as admitted by Michel Roussin, then Minister of Co-operation : a series of meetings were held at the highest levels of the French Government, in 1993-1994, to discuss strategies to defend French interests against those of the US. While visiting Gabon in July 1995, President Jacques Chirac verbally attacked “the Anglosaxons (who) dream of pushing France out of its position in Africa without paying a price”.
    Finally, and maybe most important, France uses American officials to weaken and undermine American-Israel security For example, Barack Obama has declared that France is America‟s greatest ally, yet France exported nuclear technology to Iran, according to U.S. intelligence reports, which had an active nuclear weapons program at least until 2003. France also sold nuclear technology to Pakistan (www.psr.org/nuclear-bailout/…/nuclear-power-in-france-setting.pdfSimilar). “U.S. intelligence officials claimed Pakistan was a key supplier of uranium enrichment technology to North Korea, and some media reports suggested that Pakistan had exchanged centrifuge enrichment technology for North Korean help in developing longer range missiles”
    6
    France also delivered and built Saddam Hussein‟s Osirak reactor in Iraq that was bombed by Israel in 1981. “France’s Areva nuclear engineering firm said it would sell China Guangdong Nuclear Power Corp. 20,000 tons of uranium over a decade. The contract is worth around $3.5 billion dollars.” “For French President Nicolas Sarkozy, nuclear reactors are the bridge between the West and the Islamic world… Since December, Sarkozy has signed deals with or offered nuclear technical advice to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Libya, Egypt, Algeria and Morocco.” “France hopes to sell a nuclear power station to Libya in 2010…French firms also want to gain access to Libya‟s massive unexploited oil reserves, as do the rest of the world‟s oil companies. France has a 1.3 billion-euro trade deficit with Libya, mainly due to oil imports.” “French nuclear scientist with involvement with a terrorist group Monday, opening a formal investigation into his suspected links with Al-Qaeda in North Africa” (http://www.rfi.fr/actuen/articles/118/article_5467.asp). More troubling, “Did you know Obama is using your tax dollars to support pro-Al Qaeda brigades in Libya?”
    What does it mean for France to sell nuclear technology to countries that support terrorists? First, it allows France to have many friends while America-Israel‟s enemies are emboldened. Second, Muslims who want to attack American and Israel will consider France as their protector against the United States and Israel.
    As a result, more Americans and Israeli will be trying to fight emboldened enemies as billions of dollars are spent for war on terror and thousands of Americans and Israeli are killed and wounded. In addition, many tourists will not consider the United States and Israel as their destination for vacation, and many investors will prefer doing businesses elsewhere, but the United States and Israel. America and Israel will continue to spend their time defending against their enemies while French people continue to create jobs for the French people using anti-Americo-Israel rhetoric as economic incentive. Should we say that all of these are making the United States and Israel to lose millions of jobs? Should Americans and Israeli care?
    Many Americans don’t know that by 2050 Muslim leaders will be ruling Europe because the number of Muslims will be more than the number of White Europeans. Europeans know this and they are doing their best to befriend them. In the United States, there will be about 26 million Muslims in 2050. Nobody should forget that Europeans are befriending Arab nations “to strengthen ties and existing partnerships between European and Arab nations.”
    If war breaks out between Europe and the United States or Israel, will Muslims in the United States and Israel support European Muslims? The Qu’ran is clear: “[9.29] Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those
    7
    who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.”
    In another development, France has used the some United States officials to remove pro-American and pro-Israeli presidents from power in Africa. We saw the case in Guinea when President Moussa Dadis Camara, a pro-American and pro-Israeli, Christian president was deposed and replaced by a Muslim president. In fact, the pastor who tried to make the connection between the United States and Guinea was assassinated by French-Guinean mercenaries in a jail cell. We also the case in Ivory Coast where France financed Al-Qaido through Muslim rebels, and burning pro-American Christians (See picture). Today, President Laurent Gbagbo is in prison in Hague, and President Camara is in house arrest in Burkina Faso. What Americans don‟t understand is that if the French occult network, Francafrique, was dismantle, America could create more than 20 million jobs by doing business in Africa. “On top of its mining opportunities, the continent offers interesting agricultural opportunities, “such as the plantations or outgrower production of tea, coffee, cocoa, cotton, sugar, and the like” as well as “some low-tech manufacturing for local markets, such as beer and soft drinks, plastics and cement, and a very limited amount of export manufacturing (eg textile) by subsidiaries of foreign firms, especially under the Lomé Convention which gives African countries special access to European markets” Not only that if American businesses could legally supply weapons, logistical support to courts and police units, training of soldiers and officers, and the organisation and management of “presidential guards” to about 50 countries in Africa. Do you understand the stakes?
    According to Benjamin Netanyahu, “If the Arabs put down their weapons today, there would be no more violence. If the Jews put down their weapons today, there would be no more Israel.” On the other hand, Yasser Arafat said, “Peace for us means the destruction of Israel. We are preparing for an all out war, a war which will last for generations….The Palestinian people have no national identity. I, Yasser Arafat, man of destiny, will give them that identity through conflict with Israel….The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel. For our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political
    8
    and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of Palestinian people, since Arab national interest demand that we posit the existence of a distinct ‘Palestinian people’ to oppose Zionism”. I don‟t know what you think, but I‟m a fan of Israel, and Christianity will have no meaning without Israel. I believe in my personal security the same way I believe Israel has the right to protect Israel. That is why I urge the United States and friends of Israel to stand with Israel to prevent France and Iran‟s conspiracy against the United States and Israel. People who love freedom, I hope you will join us in this cause. You may not agree with the United States and Israel in every issue; however, if France and Iran get away with their threat against the United States and Israel, you could be the next target.
    Reference
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7979496/Ahmadinejad-predicts-the-removal-of-Zionists-from-the-world.html HILARY LEILA KRIEGER AND HERB KEINON 04/22/2011: http://www.jpost.com/DiplomacyAndPolitics/Article.aspx?id=217500 http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2011/10/31/palestinian-statehood-gets-recognized-unesco-whats-next/#ixzz1l3DX9Zef
    9
    THE WRONG ENEMY IN AFRICA: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    June 2, 2011
    By Joseph Haba, MED
    PhD Candidate in Business Administration
    Africa, the poorest continent on earth, has been like a baby king whose kingdom is ruled by France, but whose isolations and miseries are wrongfully attributed to the United States. Africa has always considered France a passionate father that continues to suffer, according to Francafrique policy, from the hands of the imperialists and capitalists in the United States. Though no single evidence shows any family-like relationships between African human
    10
    capital and economic development by the French, the French media and French political gurus have always succeeded in cooking the African elite’s minds to love French cultures, but loft the English-American cultures.
    Africa, despite the sequels of the European slave trade and colonialism, continues to loft her best friend and savior: the United States of America. This anti-Americanism has been the polluted concepts the French have successfully engraved in the minds of the African masses while the African elites, most of them French nationals or French puppets, become the sponges that suck up the African economy, but the French squeeze out of them. Without knowing and without understanding this occult master-and-slave relationship between France and Africa, we, Africans have always been misled by the French because they almost always the United States as their black sheep or the ugly ducking. Can someone tell me why some people were buring the American flag in Ghana when we know that Ghana loves the United States? It was because of French involvement in Cote d’Ivoire.
    But, today, as a learned and fair-minded African I would like us, Africans to confront Francafrique’s disservice in Africa and exhibit the loyalty and emotional influence of the United States as the predestined keeper of Africa’s political and economic freedom. Many critics would think I am biased to the American culture as I write, but, after they have read the whole article, they will understand why God, and I measure my words, has preposed a predisposition democratic web between the United States and Africa. After reading this article, people will understand that the United States has been marvelously watching over Africa’s interest, and in most cases France has vigorously and unjustly persecuted the United States in most Africans’ minds. First, it was the U.S. President Franklin Roosevelt who literarily forced the British Prime Minister Churchill to compose the Atlantic Charter in 1941. This document was to direct the Allies’ war effort, and the third paragraph of the Charter stated that the Allies “respect the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live; and they will wish to see sovereign rights of self-government restored to those who have been forcibly deprived of them”. Don’t you think that returning African veterans used this paragraph as a commitment to end colonial rule in Africa? The United States has always promoted free trade, but most African nations were European colonies the same way the United States were once European colonies. Don’t you think the United States demanded African nations’ freedom so as to enter the African market and create a kind of political influence in Africa? Have we all forgotten the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union? Don’t you think the Soviet Union played a part in ending colonialism?
    One day Europeans decided to scramble Africa, and they used, as they have always used, the Berlin Treaty to claim African territories for themselves like the Gold Rush in California. These European nations, France and Britain in the lead, used nationalism to grant large African territories for themselves without African consent while the United States tried to develop and build democratic systems of government. “You think you will colonize every human race forever, you, Europeans; one day, we will tell you what to do,” probably said the American delegation that attended the Berlin Conference.
    Indeed, the United States, despite what most nations think, after recognizing and abolishing slavery in its territory, inhaled the sweet breeze that followed the end of slavery with the struggle
    11
    of the Civil Right Movement. While she struggled with her own internal problems, Africa continued to be one of her priorities. Many people don’t know a lot about the African slavery. Characterizing the African slavery to the United States, in my opinion, is a misconception. First, less than 10% of the White people in America owned slaves in the south of the United States. Moreover, since Europeans were the ones bringing slaves in the United States, it is possible that they, the Europeans, brought friends and family members in the Americas to participate in the Enslavement of Africa. This means about 5% of the 10% of those who enslaved Africans in the Americas had more interest in Europe than in the Americas. Finally, almost every body who enslaved Africans in the Americas had European background. This means that about 99% of the 10% of the White people who enslaved Africans in the Americas did it because of their European background, not of their American background. Before I continue, let’s look at these numbers:
    Over 28 Million Africans have been enslaved in the Muslim world during the past 14 centuries While much has been written concerning the Transatlantic slave trade, surprisingly little attention has been given to the Islamic slave trade across the Sahara, the Red Sea and the Indian Ocean.
    While the European involvement in the Transatlantic slave trade to the Americas lasted for just over three centuries, the Arab involvement in the slave trade has lasted fourteen centuries, and in some parts of the Muslim world is still continuing to this day. A comparison of the Muslim slave trade to the American slave trade reveals some interesting contrasts.
    While two out of every three slaves shipped across the Atlantic were men, the proportions were reversed in the Muslim slave trade. Two women for every man were enslaved by the Muslims.
    While the mortality rate for slaves being transported across the Atlantic was as high as 10%, the percentage of slaves dying in transit in the Transsahara and East African slave trade was between 80 and 90%!
    While almost all the slaves shipped across the Atlantic were for agricultural work, most of the slaves destined for the Muslim Middle East were for sexual exploitation as concubines, in harems, and for military service.
    While many children were born to slaves in the Americas, and millions of their descendants are citizens in Brazil and the USA to this day, very few descendants of the slaves that ended up in the Middle East survive.
    While most slaves who went to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male slaves destined for the Middle East were castrated, and
    12
    most of the children born to the women were killed at birth.
    It is estimated that possibly as many as 11 million Africans were transported across the Atlantic (95% of which went to South and Central America, mainly to Portuguese, Spanish and French possessions. Only 5% of the slaves went to the United States).
    A comparison of the Muslim slave trade to the American slave trade reveals some interesting contrasts. While two out of every three slaves shipped across the Atlantic were men, the proportions were reversed in the Muslim slave trade. Two women for every man were enslaved by the Muslims.
    While the mortality rate for slaves being transported across the Atlantic was as high as 10%, the percentage of slaves dying in transit in the Transsahara and East African slave trade was between 80 and 90%!
    While almost all the slaves shipped across the Atlantic were for agricultural work, most of the slaves destined for the Muslim Middle East were for sexual exploitation as concubines, in harems, and for military service.
    While many children were born to slaves in the Americas, and millions of their descendants are citizens in Brazil and the USA to this day, very few descendants of the slaves that ended up in the Middle East survive.
    While most slaves who went to the Americas could marry and have families, most of the male slaves destined for the Middle East were castrated, and most of the children born to the women were killed at birth. It is estimated that possibly as many as 11 million Africans were transported across the Atlantic (95% of which went to South and Central America, mainly to Portuguese, Spanish and French possessions. Only 5% of the slaves went to the United States).
    While Christian Reformers
    13
    spearheaded the antislavery abolitionist movements in Europe and North America, and Great Britain mobilized her Navy, throughout most of the 19th Century, to intercept slave ships and set the captives free, there was no comparable opposition to slavery within the Muslim world.
    Even after Britain outlawed the slave trade in 1807 and Europe abolished the slave trade in 1815, Muslim slave traders enslaved a further 2 million Africans. This despite vigorous British Naval activity and military intervention to limit the Muslim slave trade.
    By some calculations the number of victims of the 14 centuries of Muslim slave trade could exceed 180 million. Nearly 100 years after President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation in America, and 130 years after all slaves within the British Empire were set free by parliamentary decree, Saudi Arabia and Yemen, in 1962, and Mauritania in 1980, begrudgingly removed legalized slavery from their statute books.
    Despite these realities, the United States have protected the right of the black people, and the United States‟ influence gave independence to African nations. Should we say that everybody in the United States love black people? No! The same way every African will not love the United States, the same way some African love France and her caprices, we should not expect every American to love Africa.
    After helping Africa gain independence, the United States were considered Friends of Africa by those who known about the Atlantic Charter, but only a few Africans were literate; so France changed her her dirty trick by pretending to be the U.S. ally. The United States‟ victory in bringing about independence in African nations became eternal anti-American paradigm in Francafrique: the establishment of virtual private family-like system of governance based on corruption, dictatorship, despotism, financing civil wars. For example in Cote d’Ivoire, President Gbagbo was pro-U.S. and pro-Israel. Therefore, the French used some American politicians, who know nothing about the African and French cultures, to destroy Gbagbo’s presidency. It was not about election, it was about French companies’ interest and French politicians’ interest.
    The French used rhetorical and pejorative meaning of capitalism to portrayed Americans as imperialists and money-mongers, antihuman. The United States, joyous of her active participation in giving freedom to African nations, was avid of friendly kisses that merit her friendship. The United States started to introduce democracy and free trades in Africa, but the French did not want anything like that to happen in Africa. The French were worried that if Africans understand the meaning of democracy, freedom and free trades, the Africans would prefer dealing with the United States. Do you undertand why France is alway eager to finance the elections in Africa? The French had one weapon to disqualify the Americans. Americans are generous and friendly, but the French are snakes with two tongues. They use flip-flap languages every time when it comes to French interests. Therefore, the French pretended to be American allies in the war on terror, but they created an occult system of cultural assimilation and family bounding. In most African cultures, money has less value than relationship. The French pretend to be friends of Africa through la Francophonie and Francafrique while they use Americans‟ generosity as imperialists and capitalists.
    14
    Wasn‟t the American capitalism that developed Europe? Isn‟t the capitalistic concept that the Europeans used to scramble Africa? Yet, the French have used egregious anti-Americanism in Africa that most Africans prefer joining Arab to kill Americans. The Arabs and the Europeans have done more harm to Africa than any other people on earth. But the French make alliances with Arab nations, using religion and ethnic division, to prevent Africans from knowing the truth. These are the realities every African must know. No more nightmare of anti-Americanism by the French should stand. No more using Islam and Christianity to mislead African nations.
    The moment has come for us to unite with the United States of America to turn the wheels of integrity and justice around. Everybody should keep their religion, but the French must go out of Africa. Every French establishment in every African country belongs to those countries, and the United States must use African Americans to take the lead in the effort to Free Africa, once and for all, from Francafrique.

    Comment by Joseph Haba Respects Gbagbo — 2012/03/01 @ 6:30 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: